The History-Making California Disaster

That Can Never Be Covered Up:



While California is talking about leaving the United States, a horrific situation may require that the United States build a Chernobyl-type wall between California and the rest of America.

That wall will not be due to a political disaster but, rather, a radioactive disaster.

Realty associations, Chambers of Commerce and Jerry Brown are spending billions of dollars on PR counter-measures to say “nothing to see here” about the Fukushima radiation.

You can cover-up lots of big bad things but radiation detectors are now very cheap and easy to get and California has so much Coast-line that the entire U.S. Army could not keep people away from it.

There is no possible way to stop boat owners and the general public from dipping their Cesium probes, fiber test strips and EBAY-purchased radiation detectors in the Pacific Ocean.

The tons of hyper radioactive water pouring into the Pacific Ocean in Japan has been discovered to be a thousand times more radioactive than once thought. Forget about causing Godzilla. There is enough Cesium coming off the North coast of Japan to kill Godzilla!

The water pouring out of Japan swirls around the Pacific drum and pastes itself into the sandy beaches of California and Oregon where it is sucked deep inland, like a sponge, through a process called deep soil transit.

4 parts per metric of this kind of radiation will kill you. Fukushima is pouring 600 PARTS PER METRIC, by THE TON, into the Pacific Ocean. That is a seriously bad thing!!!!

The Silicon Valley Oligarchs tell their owned newspapers and lap dog Jerry Brown to hush up the disaster because they all own lovely coastal property investments.

Fukushima nuclear reactor radiation at highest level since 2011 ...

Fukushima nuclear reactor radiation at
        highest level since 2011 ...

Cranes over the Fukushima Daiichi plant in February 2016. ... is far higher than the previous record of 73 sieverts an hour detected by sensors in 2012. ... at this stage,” Tepco's spokesman Tatsuhiro Yamagishi told AFP.

google news cached proxied[...]ion-levels-highest-since-2011-meltdown

Fukushima Report Declassified: Worse Than We Were Told

General aerial view of Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)'s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Fukushima prefecture, taken by Kyodo March 11, 2015. Wednesday marks the fourth year anniversary of the March 11, 2011 earthquake and ...

bing news cached proxied[...]-declassified-worse-than-we-were-told/

Fukushima: Worse Than a Disaster

They’re not radioactive and still much faster than rubbing two sticks together ... Still, Prime Minister Abe told the Olympic selection committee that Fukushima was “under control.” “This debate has dogged him since his Sept.

google news bing news cached proxied

Fukushima report declassified: Worse than we were told

Another report this week revealed there are more than nine million bags of nuclear material piling up in Japan, according to the Fukushima Prefecture and the Environment Ministry. Anti-nuclear activist Dr Helen Caldicott said during the crisis that if unit ...

google news bing news cached proxied

Why Fukushima's High Radiation Levels are Actually a Good Thing

Why Fukushima's High Radiation Levels are
        Actually a Good Thing

... Fukushima has again made headlines with some seemingly worse ... As told by experts, a tenth of a sievert (100 millisieverts) increases the ... What experts found is just an area with radiation levels much higher than before.

google news cached proxied[...]ion-detected-is-actually-a-good-thing/

The Fukushima disaster is much worse than you are being told

The truth about the Fukushima disaster is not revealed to the public. The truth is much worse than it was said ... A government mole told her. According to Mako, TEPCO and the government deliberately cover-up deaths of Fukushima workers, and not only ...

bing news cached proxied[...]-is-much-worse-than-you-are-being-told

John Doerr, Elon Musk, Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Steve Westly, Vinod Khosla and Steve Jurvetson manipulated faked public fear in order to scam trillions of taxpayer dollars

US govt agency manipulated data to exaggerate ‘climate change’ ahead of UN conference – whistleblower

February 9, 2017

A recently-retired top scientist from the America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has accused his superiors of fudging data to hide a slowdown in the rise of global temperatures ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference in 2015.

John Bates told the Mail on Sunday that Thomas Karl, the head of the climate change department at the government agency, authored a paper based on doctored data, “rushed” it into publication, and then saw his work used to make international commitments to fight global warming worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

Climate change data manipulated whistleblower

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Former US President Barack Obama, French President Francois Hollande and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Paris Climate Conference in 2015.

After rising by 0.113C per decade between 1950 and 1999, temperatures appeared to have stabilized between 2000 and 2014, despite rising levels of CO2 emissions, which climate change scientists said were responsible for the earlier warming.

The “pause,” unveiled in a 2012 UN report, shook up the entire scientific community, and cast doubt upon hundreds of models confidently predicting a trend of accelerating warming.

        warming data proven to be fake climate change

The main Pausebuster study graph.

But then, Karl’s “pausebuster” paper emerged, just months before Barack Obama, Angela Merkel and scores of other world leaders congregated in Paris, showing that global warming was not slowing down, but actually accelerating to 0.116C per decade.

Bates said that in the period preceding the publication, Karl was “insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.”

Bates claims that the land temperature readings cited in the study were calculated using two combined historical records, with the help of an unfinished and buggy piece of software, whose findings cannot be independently verified, and have still not been confirmed by the authors. For the sea temperature records, Karl decided to use temperatures collected by ships.