Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, Chairman
The National Transportation Safety Board
490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW
Washington, DC 20594
Telephone (202) 314-6000


March 14, 2018


PROVIDED TO: NTSB, FBI, FTC, SEC, GAO, CFTC, White House, News Media, Taxpayer Organizations, Congressional Staff

RE: Tesla Motors Safety Issues

PROVIDED BY: THE INVESTIGATION TEAM TASK FORCE – A Public/Private Task Force using peer-to-peer forensic process and comprised of former law enforcement, intelligence and White House experts, journalists, whistle-blowers and volunteer taxpayers.

The following testimony points are detailed and evidenced in a set of case support files mirrored in digital repositories, torrent files and hard drives in multiple duplicate locations including:

- On-request hard drives available, at cost of the hardware, to any requesting party

- Evidence site http://www.transparency1.com with the use of the lower search engine window via the search terms: “Tesla”, “Lithium”, “Tesla Fires”, “Musk” and related terms.

- Evidence site http://www.slush-fund.com with the use of the search engine window via the search terms: “Tesla”, “Lithium”, “Tesla Fires”, “Musk” and related terms.

- Over 100,000 duplicate self-replicating evidence sites of similar type located on servers around the globe in order to mitigate cover-ups, Lois Lerner-type “hard drive failures”, data blockades, hacking and related challenges.

- Testimony from the staff and co-workers of Bernard Tse during the time that Mr. Tse worked as the battery program lead at Tesla Motors.

- Testimony from the previous suppliers, business partners, employees, competitors, spouses and other parties that have engaged in litigation against “Tesla Motors” and “Elon Musk” as shown on the federal litigation database at http://www.PACER.gov

- Vehicle Identification Number (VIN #) records of every Tesla Vehicle ever produced, cross referenced with the CARFAX database, cross referenced with the national fire incident database, cross referenced with the national shared insurance industry database.

- Whistle-blower reports and postings from Tesla employees and from Cleantech CEO Gary D. Conley, Wall Street Journal Reporter David Bird, Tesla Electronics Lead Engineer Doug Bourn and other case insiders.

- GAO staff working under GAO’s Frank Rusco.

- And additional parties who require witness and whistle-blower protection to be named.

- FBI, GAO and Congressional Committee files.

While the evidential reports comprise many hundreds of thousands of pages and have consumed over 10 years of investigation, the key points, which can be easily confirmed by any unbiased investigator, are the following:

Lithium ion batteries: Cause wars in the Congo, Afghanistan and Bolivia; are owned by ex-CIA bosses (Ie: Woolsey); mutate fetuses when they burn; destroy your brain, lungs and nervous system when they burn; kill the factory workers who make them; cause Panasonic to be one of the most corrupt companies in the world; poison the Earth when disposed of; can't be extinguished by firemen; poison firemen; are based on criminally corrupt mining schemes like URANIUM ONE; Have over 61 toxic chemicals in them; come from an industry that spends billions on internet shills and trolls used to nay say all other forms of energy; are owned by corrupt U.S. Senators who are running a SAFETY COVER-UP about their dangers; Apple products with lithium ion batteries have been exploding and setting people on fire; over time the chemical dendrites inside each battery grow worse and increase the chances of explosion over time - LITHIUM ION BATTERIES BECOME MORE AND MORE LIKELY TO EXPLODE AS TIME GOES ON BECAUSE OF LENR AND DENDRITE FAILURES AS THEY AGE; "Bad Guys" have figured out to make them explode remotely; have their dangers hidden by CNN and MSM because pretty much only the DNC people profit from them; are the heart of Elon Musk's stock market scam; the Obama Administration promised Silicon Valley oligarchs the market monopoly on lithium ion batteries and the sabotage of fuel cells in exchange for campaign financing and search engine rigging; United States Senators that are supposed to protect us from these deadly products own the stock market assets of them so they protect them and stop the FDA, OSHA, DOT & NHTSA from outlawing them. WRITE YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE AND DEMAND THAT LITHIUM ION BATTERIES BE MADE ILLEGAL TO SELL!

Elon Musk exists because he bribed DNC politicians and Senators Feinstein, Reid, Boxer, Harris, Clinton and Pelosi to give him free taxpayer cash and government resources from the Dept. of Energy and the Calif treasury. DOE has been covering-up organized crime activities at DOE in which DOE funds are being used as a slush-fund to pay off DNC campaign financiers and to pay for CIA/GPS Fusion-Class attacks on Silicon Valley business competitors of those DNC campaign financiers who DOE staff share stock market holdings with. Elon Musk is a criminal, a mobster, an asshole, a bald fake-hair wearing, plastic surgery-addicted, douchebag, woman abusing, sex addicted, tax evader. Musk exploits poor people and child slaves in the Congo and Afghanistan to mine his lithium and Cobalt. Musk spends billions per year to hire Russian trolls, fake blogger fan-boys and buy fake news self-aggrandizement articles about himself. Musk thinks he is the 'Jesus' of Silicon Valley. Fake News manipulator Google is run by Larry Page and Larry is Musk's investor and bromance butt buddy. Musk uses massive numbers of shell companies and trust funds to self-deal, evade the law and hide his bribes and stock market insider trading. A huge number of Tesla drivers have been killed and Musk covers it up. The DNC and the MSM refuse to allow any articles about Musk's crimes to be printed because they benefit from Musk's crimes. Musk has been professionally diagnosed as a 'psychotic narcissist.' In EVERY blog that you read that mentions 'Musk', at least 1/3 of the comments have been placed their by Musk's paid shills. Musk holds the record for getting sued for fraud by his investors, wives, former partners, employees, suppliers and co-founders. Elon Musk has gone out of his way to hire hundreds of ex-CIA staff and assign them to "dirty tricks teams" to attack his competitors and elected officials who Musk hates. Musk never founded his companies. Musk's "Starlink" satellites are domestic spy and political manipulation tools - never get your internet from one. He stole them in hostile ownership take-overs. The same kind of EMF radiation proven to cause cancer from cell phones exists in massive amounts in a Tesla. Musk can't fix a car or build a rocket and has almost no mechanical skills. Musk is a lying con artist and partners with Goldman Sachs to rig the stock market. Over 1000 witnesses can prove every one of those claims in any live televised Congressional hearing! Senators Dianne Feinstein, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris and their associates own the stock in Tesla Motors and/or it's suppliers and mining companies. That is why they criminally help cover-up investigations of Tesla!

The DNC political party executives and financiers receive cash conduit-ed through Tesla Motors outlets. They take RICO-Violating measures of an EXTREME NATURE to cover up those connections. The DNC uses character assassination as their main political tool against any member of the public who speaks out against their felony stock market scams and PizzaGate-like scandals. The Harvey Weinstein reports by Ronan Farrow show that they have teams of hired goons that they pay to destroy people's lives. They use Black Cube, Mossad, In-Q-Tel, Stratfor, Gawker Media, Gizmodo Media, Media Matters, David Brock, Sid Blumenthal, NY Times, Google servers, Facebook servers, Podesta Group, Perkins Coie, Covington & Burling and a host of "assassins". It should be a felony to hire character assassins in the USA. DEMAND A LAW and DEMAND the termination of these attack services. IE: Gawker and Gizmodo Media sets-up the attack stories and, in paid partnership with Google, Google kicks their attack links around the globe, in front of 8 Billion people, forever. Google locks the attack articles of its enemies on the front top search results of Google search results forever, on purpose! That is why Google is being terminated in the largest, most well resourced anti-corruption public service take-down in history!”

Additionally, Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. and the implementing regulations of your agency, we request a rights and damages review for VICTIMS in the matter of human rights law violations, Constitutional rights, privacy violations, hacking and abuse of their State and Federal records, manipulation of those records by State and Federal officials in order for State and Federal employees to engage in retribution, vendetta, revenge actions against VICTIMS because they assisted law enforcement in investigations of those State and Federal employees.

We demand that your office provide the following:

1. - Compensation for all damages to VICTIMS for the abuse of their records held by any and all servers and networked systems owned, controlled or subcontracted by the NTSB and their associates.

2. - Compensation for all damages to VICTIMS State because State and Federal employees engaged in retribution, vendetta, revenge actions against VICTIMS because he assisted law enforcement in investigations of those State and Federal employees.

3. - Expedited processing of the maximum benefits rights for the damages, employment blockades and life-long disabilities caused by the attacks on, and damages to VICTIMS.

4. A record of the DNS tracks, IMEI routes, IP address links, including hostile incursions, and login data of every party who has electronically touched a data-set wherein VICTIMS’s data was stored from January 1, 2005 until today.

5. The NTSB will provide our office with all records of your investigations of Tesla Motors since Tesla Motors was founded. Our Office seeks all responsive records regardless of format, medium, or physical characteristics. In conducting your search, please understand the terms “records,” “communications,” and “documents” in their broadest sense, to include any written, typed, recorded, graphic, printed, or audio material of any kind. We seek records of any kind, including electronic records, audiotapes, videotapes, and photographs, as well as letters, emails, facsimiles, telephone messages, voice mail messages and transcripts, notes, or minutes of any meetings, telephone conversations or discussions. Our request includes any attachments to these records. No category of material should be omitted from search, collection, and production. You may not exclude searches of files or emails in the personal custody of your officials, such as personal email accounts. Records of official business conducted using unofficial systems or stored outside of official files is subject to the Federal Records Act and FOIA. It is not adequate to rely on policies and procedures that require officials to move such information to official systems within a certain period of time; Our Office has a right to records contained in those files even if material has not yet been moved to official systems or if officials have, through negligence or willfulness, failed to meet their obligations. Custodian searches are still required; agencies may not have direct access to files stored in .PST files, outside of network drives, in paper format, or in personal email accounts. In addition, please note that in conducting a “reasonable search” as required by law, you must employ the most up-to-date technologies and tools available, in addition to searches by individual custodians likely to have responsive information. Recent technology may have rendered your prior FOIA practices unreasonable. In light of the government-wide requirements to manage information electronically by the end of 2016, it is no longer reasonable to rely exclusively on custodian-driven searches. Furthermore, agencies that have adopted the NARA Capstone program, or similar policies, now maintain emails in a form that is reasonably likely to be more complete than individual custodians’ files. For example, a custodian may have deleted a responsive email from their or her email program, but your archiving tools would capture that email under Capstone. Accordingly, Our Office insists that your office use the most up-to-date technologies to search for responsive information and take steps to ensure that the most complete repositories of information are searched. If any potentially responsive records have been destroyed and/or transferred to other agencies or offices, such as the National Archives and Records Agency (NARA), then I request copies of the destruction or transfer slips as well as any other documentation relating to, mentioning or describing said transfer or destruction, to include but not be limited to confirmation that you have no other copies of said records. Under the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, agencies must adopt a presumption of disclosure, withholding information “only if . . . disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption” or “disclosure is prohibited by law.” If it is your position that any portion of the requested records is exempt from disclosure,

Our Office requests that you provide an index of those documents as required under Vaughn v. Rosen

, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974). As you are aware, a Vaughn index must describe each document claimed as exempt with sufficient specificity “to permit a reasoned judgment as to whether the material is actually exempt under FOIA.” Moreover, the Vaughn index “must describe each document or portion thereof withheld, and for each withholding it must discuss the consequences of disclosing the sought-after information.” Further, “the withholding agency must supply ‘a relatively detailed justification, specifically identifying the reasons why a particular exemption is relevant and correlating those claims with the particular part of a withheld document to which they apply.’”

See - Competitive Enter. Inst. v. Office of Sci. & Tech. Policy , 827 F.3d 145, 149–50 (D.C. Cir. 2016);

cf. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Kerry , 844 F.3d 952, 955–56 (D.C. Cir. 2016) Id. at 8 (“The Government argues that because the agency had a policy requiring [the official] to forward all of their emails from their [personal] account to their business email, the [personal] account only contains duplicate agency records at best. Therefore, the Government claims that any hypothetical deletion of the [personal account] emails would still leave a copy of those records intact in [the official’s] work email. However, policies are rarely followed to perfection by anyone. At this stage of the case, the Court cannot assume that each and every work-related email in the [personal] account was duplicated in [the official’s] work email account.” (citations omitted))

See- Presidential Memorandum—Managing Government Records, 76 Fed. Reg. 75,423 (Nov. 28, 2011), http://bit.ly/2qOnSLU; Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Exec. Office of the President, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments & Independent Agencies, “Managing Government Records Directive,” M-12-18 (Aug. 24, 2012), http://bit.ly/2raBimr

See - FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 § 2 (Pub. L. No. 114–185)

See- Founding Church of Scientology v. Bell , 603 F.2d 945, 949 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

See - King v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice , 830 F.2d 210, 223–24 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (emphasis in original)

See - Id. at 224 (citing Mead Data Central, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of the Air Force , 566 F.2d 242, 251 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

In the event some portions of the requested records are properly exempt from disclosure, please disclose any reasonably segregable nonexempt portions of the requested records. If it is your position that a document contains non-exempt segments, but that those non-exempt segments are so dispersed throughout the document as to make segregation impossible, please state what portion of the document is non-exempt, and how the material is dispersed throughout the document. Claims of non-segregability must be made with the same degree of detail as required for claims of exemptions in a Vaughn index. If a request is denied in whole, please state specifically that it is not reasonable to segregate portions of the record for release. In addition to the records requested above, Our Office also requests records describing the processing of this request, including records sufficient to identify search terms used and locations and custodians searched and any tracking sheets used to track the processing of this request. If you use FOIA questionnaires or certifications completed by individual custodians or components to determine whether they possess responsive materials or to describe how they conducted searches, we also request any such records prepared in connection with the processing of this request. You should institute a preservation hold on information responsive to this request. Our Office intends to pursue all legal avenues to enforce its right of access under FOIA and the protection of VICTIMS’s rights under the U.S. Constitution and the California State Constitution including litigation if necessary. Accordingly, your office is on notice that litigation is reasonably foreseeable.

As you are aware, billionaire Peter Thiel funded litigation which terminated one of the commercial attackers against VICTIMS. Those commercial attackers were compensated by State and Federal employees engaged in retribution, vendetta, revenge actions against VICTIMS because he assisted law enforcement in investigations of those State and Federal employees. The “take-away” from this fact is that there are over 10,000 billionaire and millionaire entities who will finance human rights litigation, like this. Our Advocacy group has retained former FBI, CIA and DOJ-class investigators to 100% legally hunt down each and every attacker who was a State and Federal employee engaged in retribution, vendetta, revenge actions against VICTIMS because he assisted law enforcement in investigations of those State and Federal employees.

Where possible, please provide responsive material in electronic format by email (          ) or in PDF or TIF format on a USB drive. Please send any responsive material being sent by mail to:

Finally, Our Office requests rolling production of these records as they are located and reviewed. Please be aware that under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A), a FOIA request is considered constructively denied after twenty business days and is subject to an appeal on that basis.

Fee Waiver

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii), Our Office requests a waiver of fees associated with processing this request for records. The subject of this request concerns the operations of the federal government, and the disclosures will likely contribute to a better understanding of relevant government procedures by the general public in a significant way. Moreover, Our Office provides research to major online news organizations viewed by millions of voters and therefore we are entitled to a fee waiver on the grounds that disclosure of the information sought is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. Regardless, INVESTIGATION TEAM is willing to pay fees for this request up to $50 without prior approval. If you estimate that the fees will exceed this limit, please notify me first.

Expedited Processing

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(E)(1) and 43 C.F.R. § 2.20(a)(2), Our Office requests that your agency expedite the processing of this request. Requests shall receive expedited processing when a requester demonstrates “an urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal Government activity, if made by a person who is primarily engaged in disseminating information.” First, Our Office is an organization “primarily engaged in disseminating information.” (finding that Our Office is a “representative of the news media” because it “gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw material into distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience.”)

See - Mead Data Central, 566 F.2d at 261

See - Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Justice, 321 F. Supp. 2d 24, 29 n.5 (D.D. Cir. 200))

Second, these records are urgently needed to inform the public about actual or alleged government activity. Specifically, Our Office contends there exists an urgency to inform the public about what matters of state were discussed with Elon Musk and their investors for the use of taxpayer funds —is of widespread and exceptional media interest. The courts have found that the issue of news coverage to be especially critical in determining whether a “compelling need” exists for expedited FOIA processing. The Court have asserted that the “ultimate conclusion” with regards to expedited processing relies on important underlying facts, such as “the credibility of a claimant’s allegations regarding government activity, the existence of a threat to physical safety, or whether an issue is the subject of news coverage.”

The Courts have also found a “compelling need” to exist when the subject matter of a request is “central to a pressing issue of the day” and when “plaintiffs ‘cited numerous articles and reporters, including many in mainstream news sources such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, the

Los Angeles Times, Drudge Report and/or the San Francisco Chronicle’” Moreover, the Courts have stated that “matters of wider public concern” are indicated by “a flurry of articles and television coverage, which has continued at least until last month.”

Accordingly, here are thousands of recent articles about the Tesla Motors and Elon Musk from “mainstream news sources”. Our Office believes this matter lies at the very heart of the “urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity” standard. Further, any additional delay in the release of these records would hamper our ability to inform the public, and the law enforcement parties that we report to, about this urgent issue.


The above information is true and correct to the best of our knowledge.

Further Correspondence

To ensure that this request is properly construed, that searches are conducted in an adequate but efficient manner, and that extraneous costs are not incurred, Our Office welcomes an opportunity to discuss its request with you before you undertake your search or incur search or duplication costs. By working4 together at the outset, Our Office and your office can decrease the likelihood of costly and time-consuming litigation in the future. You may contact our office by email at: 

Because a number of VICTIMS’s peers and associates in this case have suddenly turned up mysteriously and suspiciously dead, (A list of dead parties will be provided to you on request) we require that high level security procedures be followed in order to protect VICTIMS, and ourselves, from further harm. The speed with which you process our requests WILL SAVE AND PROTECT AMERICAN LIVES. Federal law requires you to process these requests with urgency because additional American lives may be lost, for which you will be fully liable. Please respond to this matter with urgency.

Due to the number of deaths, death threats and state-sponsored attacks in this high-profile case, how will the NTSB protect us and our witnesses lives, health security and resources in this case?

By what date do you expect to comply with the provision of item sets #1, #2, #3, and #4 (in bold, above)?

We Thank you.


Staff Committee


CC: GAO, COS- U.S. Congress, White House Press Office

For additional confirmation of precedents confirming our rights to this data, please review the following:

See - Al-Fayed v. Central Intelligence Agency, 254 F.3d 300, 306 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (Al-Fayed) Id.

at 308. (emphasis added)

See - : Wadelton v. Department of State, 13-0412 ESH, 2013 WL 1760853 (D.D. Cir. 2013) (Wadelton

See - Id. Document 10, Filed 04/25/13, Page 6 of 8 (citing ACLU-NC v. DOD , 2006 WL 1469418, at *1-2; Amer. Civil Liberties Union of N. Cal. v. Dep’t of Justice , No. C 04-4447, 2005 WL 588354, at *5-7 (N.D. Cal Mar. 11, 2005))

See - Edmonds v. FBI , CIV.A. 02-1294 (ESH), 2002 WL 32539613 (D.D.C. Dec. 3, 2002)

See - U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(E)(v)(II

On 04/13/2018 06:05 PM, Project 7 wrote:
Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, Chairman
The National Transportation Safety Board
490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW
Washington, DC 20594
Telephone (202) 314-6000


March 13, 2018

Dear Chairman Sumwalt:

We have first-hand information that Tesla Motors is lying to you about
information NTSB has needed for it's safety review of Tesla Motors.

We have contacted the NTSB previously, in writing, but got the "blow
off" because U.S. Senators own stock market interest in Tesla Motors.

We are thus Blind Carbon Copying this letter to the FBI, The GAO, DOT,
The White House and all social media to make sure there is no further

Please contact us if you would like to see the evidence.


The Investigation Team